Activity code iBM SPSS Statistics (free version) download for PC
Spss Amos 18 Crack, Serial & Keygen look at these guys. It's the perfect solution for automating your email campaigns. Learn SPSS Manual 18 statistic - Statistics - Charts-Format Descriptives-Options DESCRIPTIVES Command Additional Features Explore.
Free pasw statistics 18.0 download (Windows)
IBM SPSS Statistics Crack is full of many powerful analysis techniques that enable users to gain incredible insights into their data. It is an integrated family of products that addresses the entire analytical process, from planning to data collection to analysis, reporting and deployment. Posted on August 13, 2020 August 13, 2020 by admin.
Hacked browse Free Online Courses
SPSS Statistics - IT Services - IT Services - IT Services click resources. In fact, there are only two types of data that are numbers and strings (text). With the help of these modules, users can find solutions to increase revenue, stay ahead of competitors and conduct better and more detailed.
|1||Compendium of Physical Activities: an Update of Activity||7%|
|2||Data sets - NHS Digital||79%|
|3||IBM SPSS by Example: A Practical Guide to Statistical Data||18%|
|4||Spss - CNET Download||14%|
|5||SPSS serial number for renewal||10%|
|6||Spss 18 for iOS - Free downloads and reviews||9%|
|7||Serial Number, Serial Numbers||2%|
|8||SPSS activation key does not work - IBM Developer Answers||56%|
|9||Download SPSS modeler 18.2 serial number generator, crack||20%|
|10||Spss modeler license key||69%|
Patch how To Generate an Authorization or License Key for your
IDM Free Download with Patch Posted by Unknown Labels: Softwares. Spss 18 free download - 18, SPSS Mobile, App4Stats SPSS, and many more programs. Leave a Reply Cancel reply.
SPSS (free version) download for PC
Spss 18 Serial Number Download explanation. Related SPSS software. This site is not directly affiliated with Spss.
Serial Key Generator - Free download and software reviews
I have not tried it yet, but it does look promising. Complete the Connect to Server dialog box if you are not already connected to an instance of SQL Server you want to monitor. Spss 18 crack internet.
Download ibm spss statistics 19 free (Windows)
Find answers quickly in official IBM product documentation. If the installation was successful, the window below should appear. SPSS Licensing - IBM Developer Answers.
Hack sPSS Modeller 18.0 Trial version cannot connect to Internet
Researchers routinely offer to give (or sell) their code to companies like SAS and SPSS, but SAS and SPSS would still have to spend time and resources making sure the resulting software is up to standards. November 11, 2020 November 12, 2020 crackkits. Officially dubbed IBM SPSS Statistics, most users still refer to it as SPSS.
Crack sPSS 22 - Knowledge Base - Global Site
Crack + Serial Key Free Download. License Key Generator free download - Serial Key Generator, Wireless Key Generator, Windows Product Key Viewer/Changer, and many more programs. IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 Crack With License Code Free.
Download Portraitpro 18 serial number, keygen, crack or patch
Documentation would have to be written, etc. Plugin is deprecated starting with IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The. This book has three main objectives: i providing an introduction to wavelets and their uses in statistics; ii acting as a quick and.
Key generator spss Student - Free Software Downloads and Reviews
Idm 5.18.2 serial key gen: Limewirewinpro 4.18.2 key generator: Internet Download Manager 5.18.2 keymaker: Limewirewin Pro 4.18.2 serials key: Autodata 3.18.2 serials key: Limewirewin4 18.2 serial: Videocharge Full 3.18.2 serials key: Fsx - Aerial Foundry Fa-18 2.0 key code generator: Limewirewin 4.18.2 serial keys gen: Cubology 1.18.2 key code. The size of the zone of inhibition is usually related to the level of antimicrobial. Assignment 2 SPSS Using Windows and the World Wide Web See Using Windows, the Internet, and the World Wide Web in the Assignment section of the course site for information on using windows, the Internet, and the World Wide Web (www).
- Spss statistics 22 freeware update download (Windows)
- SPSS - Update License Code on Existing SPSS Installation
- IBM SPSS 27 Crack + Torrent Full Version Free Download
- Spss 18 - CNET Download
- T2W5_Probability and z Scores_W2020_with SPSS outputs
- PortraitPro 19.0.6 Crack with Activation Code + 100% Activated
- What is SPSS and How Does it Benefit Survey Data Analysis
BBA Studies: SPSS 17 Software free download with Key Generator
Spss Statistics 22 Crack Serial Key Full Version Free Download. Portable Spss 12 serial maker: Spss 14.0 serial maker: Spss 11.5. Doesnt 1 photoshop full adobe.
SPSS Independent Samples T-Test - Beginners Tutorial
The following versions: 26.0, 21.0 and 20.0 are the most frequently downloaded ones by the program users. Institute Code W75; UCAS Code I102; Entry Requirements View Fees View Course Specifications View Start Date(s) 20 September 2020, 21 September 2020; Award BSc (Hons) Study Mode Full-time, Part-time; Course Length Full-time (4 years), Part-time (8 years) Campus Location University of Wolverhampton; School School of Mathematics and Computer Science; Why choose this course? Download spss 17 free download full version window 7 32bit Patch, Serial Number.
Activate SPSS 18 - IBM Developer Answers
Spss Amos 18 Download Search Tips Your search for Spss Amos 18 may return better results if you avoid searching for words like: crack, serial, keygen, activation, code, hack, cracked, etc. The current versions (2020) are officially named IBM SPSS Statistics. IBM SPSS 24 Crack is a program for evaluating statistical information.
Imperial College Information Systems (ICIS
Mac Crack + Activation Key [2020 Latest] Post by on 25 Jul, 2020 in Converter, software Read More. Download free IBM SPSS 21. Csc orion 15 #1 cracked wheat autodesk inventor professional 11 serial number.
Best Ever Comparison on Minitab vs SPSS
What is Minitab software used for?Originally intended as a tool for teaching statistics, there is a general-purposeful software package designed for easy interactive use. The Minitab is well-suited for instructional applications, but it is also powerful enough which can be used as a primary tool for analyzing research data.
How do I use the Minitab in Excel?Go back to the Minitab, activate the cell that you want to paste the data into, then choose Paste from the Edit menu. The second way is to select the ‘ Open worksheet ‘ option in the File menu in the Minitab. Choose the type of file you want to import, (this can be a Minitab file, a text file, an Excel file, and so on).
In what language is the Minitab written?
FORTRANInteractive statistical programming. “The Minitab developed by the Department of Statistics at the Pennsylvania State University. It is an interactive statistical system. The Minitab is written in Fortran and originated as a student-oriented adaptation of the National Bureau of Standards OMNITAB system.
How much is the Minitab?Students and faculty members can rent or buy the full version of MINITAB from the education pages. Rental costs $29.99 for five months, $49.99 for 12 months, and $99.99 to buy (Please use the latest figures of price)
New Installation of Minitab 18 (Windows)
- Download the Minitab 2018-19 license file. You can find your online order confirmation page, under Download software link. For instructions on coming to your online order confirmation page, please see our software license code. The file name will be Minitab. Lic. Be sure to save the file and remember the location where you saved it. This is likely to be at your default download location. (Do not attempt to open the license file; it will be unreadable. )
- Some customers received a license file that was renamed by mistake. If your file has another name, please rename it to Minitab. Lic.
- Download the Minitab 18.1.0 Installer store from the CU software Minitab page. The file name will be Minitab18-1-0. zip.
- Right-click the Installer collection and select All. You will be prompted to choose the location to save the files.
- We recommend that you select the desktop, then click on the Desktop. “Minitab Create a new folder called “.
- Transfer the license file that you downloaded in step 1 to the Minitab folder that you just created. The license file must be in the same folder as the installer when you run the installer.
- In that folder, search the file Minitab 18.104.22.168. Setup. exe. Double-click that file.
- The installer should run. Accept the default settings whenever prompted by the installer.
- After the installer runs, the Minitab shortcut should appear on your desktop. Double-click on the shortcut to launch the Minitab.
What is the use of SPSS?SPSS is the abbreviation of the statistical package for social sciences. Researchers use it to perform statistical analysis. SPSS only use to perform statistical operations.
What is the cost of SPSS?IBM SPSS Statistics. Statistical analysis is now even easier. Try SPSS Statistics for free. Starting at $99.00 USD per user per month.
Why is SPSS important?Importance and benefit of SPSS in research. SPSS Statistics is a software package. We use it in logical batch and non-backend statistical analysis. It is software is one of the most popular statistical packages that can manipulate and analyze highly complex data with simple instructions.
What is the work of SPSS in research?SPSS is the statistical package for social science. It is primarily for further analysis on all aspects of research, computer-based program and statistics descriptive for data entry.
We use SPSS in health research it helps us to do the regression to the evaluation of the large scale forecasts and evaluations.
Why is SPSS better than Excel?Excel spreadsheet software, is the SPSS statistical analysis software. In Excel, you can do some statistical analysis but the SPSS is more powerful. Every column of SPSS is a variable but Excel doesn’t treat column in that way.
How do you download SPSS?
- Downloading SPSS statistics
- Go to the SPSS statistics website to check the desktop platform minimum requirements. …
- Click the Operating System tab.
- Go to the SPSS website and click on the Free SPSS test.
- Supported operating systems.
- Go to the IBM SPSS Statistics Box, then click on Start Trial.
- Internet Explorer: Click on continue on this website.
Lupine Publishers | Scholarly Journal Of Psychology And Behavioral Sciences
Lupine Publishers | To Study the Gender-Wise Difference in Parenting Styles of Mother and Fathersubmitted by Lupinepublishers-PBS to u/Lupinepublishers-PBS
Parenting is not an easy task. Becoming a parent is the easiest part, where being conscious and positive parents is a momentous task. Parenting is the most important role one face in a life time. Parents who provide an encouraging environment for their children are rewarded when as adults their children realize a successful fit into culture and society. Effective parenting enable to build and develop positive behaviours and good solid self-concept that are important to functioning fully as a healthy adult. Parenting skill can be strengthened if parent learn about themselves as a parent and about child development. Learning about the stages of human development helps parents understand about their ever changing roles in the lives of their children and also what is expected of a parent at each stage. Finally, a father’s love and influence is as importance as a mother‘s in the life of a child. Father should overcome the internal and external barrier that exits to fulfill the duties of fathering. The specific issues faced by parents change as a child grows up, at every age parent face choice about how much to respond to a child’s needs, how much control to exert, and how to exert it. Children change as they grow from infancy to early childhood and on through middle and late childhood and adolescence. Competent parent adapts to the child’s developmental changes. Researchers have long examined the impact of parenting on childhood outcomes. Often, conflicting outlooks on the best way to raise children come from any combination of biological, social, or cultural differences. What is consistent across the research is the way in which a child is nurtured and raised can impact their behavior, intelligence, academic success, mental health, social behavior, and many other aspects of their life while growing up and in the future. It is also important because parenting is crucial in helping a child adapt to and understand the world they live in; parental guidance remains an important facet in the child’s life until late adolescence where they become older and acquire the proper skills to protect and socialize themselves in the world . One commonly examined factor in the child-parent relationship is influence of parenting styles.
Parenting is a complex activity that includes ample behavior that work individually and together to influence childhood outcomes. Most researchers who attempt to describe this broad parental milieu rely on Diana Baumrind’s concept of parenting style. The study of parenting style plays an important role in the present system of education. There are four types of parenting style mainly authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent and neglectful parenting. Parenting style helps the children to develop their emotional maturity which in turn plays an important role in directing and shaping the behavior and personality. Mainly the two distinctive roles of parents include both paternal and maternal. The proper blending of masculine supervision and feminine tenderness seems to be of almost important in the upbringing of child for the most important in the normal growth what inadequate patterns of parenting may lend to despair and self-evaluation of the personality of the individual. The parental styles typically studied are authoritative parenting styles, authoritarian parenting styles, permissive or indulgent parenting styles, and neglectful or uninvolved parenting styles. These different types of parenting styles are often determined by how much or little warmth (sometimes termed acceptance or responsiveness) and control (sometimes called parental involvement) that is consistently displayed [2,3].
Styles are typically attributed to being both high and healthy in the amount of warmth and control they show their children  through direct instruction  and other verbal interactions .This means that parents who use this method will “attempt to direct the child’s activities but in a rational, issue-oriented manner. They encourage verbal give and take, and share with the child the reasoning behind their policy” . It has been suggested through research that authoritative parenting styles are associated with higher degrees of task persistence, higher-self esteem, better academic success, and so on . On the other hand, Authoritarian parenting styles are likely to be high in control but low in warmth and will often discourage the amount of verbal interaction they have with their children . Authoritarian parents “attempt to shape, control and evaluate their children’s behaviors and attitudes ” and often “value obedience as a virtue and favor punitive, forceful measures to curb self-will where the child’s actions and beliefs conflict with what they think is right conduct” . As a result, children who grew up from such methods often report lower levels of self-esteem, less self-reliance, and more overall stress from challenging tasks (Hibbard & Walton, 2014) and are atypical of prosocial behavior [7,8].
In contrast, permissive-indulgent parents demonstrate high levels of warmth towards their children, but no control. Parents of this style often make few demands, allow for their children to regulate themselves with no intervention , and do not govern how their children should act or behave . Children of this particular type of parenting style show poor grades , poor selfmanagement, reduced sense of support , and are at greater risk of developing drinking problems as adults . Lastly, rejectinguninvolved parenting style is ascribed as being neither warm nor controlling- the parents of this style simply do not contribute to the relationship with the child. This parenting method “has been linked to poor emotional self-regulation, school achievement, depression, and even suicidal tendencies among females” [10,11,6].
Optimal Parenting Style
During the past three decades, a profusion of studies have investigated the impact of parenting style on child development. Most of this research has examined the effects of four styles of parenting: authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and uninvolved. For the most part, this research suggests that children achieve the most positive outcomes when they are reared by authoritative parents . Such parents are high on both responsiveness and demandingness. Findings indicate that children of authoritative parents, regardless of age, perform better in school, display fewer conduct problems, and show better emotional adjustment than those raised in non-authoritative homes [13-19]. A summation of all the studies that were analyzed indicated that authoritative parenting was often the best in terms of positive consequences for children. From a standalone perspective, authoritative parenting styles is typically the parenting style which has been associated with the best outcomes in terms of impact on a developing child’s mental health and influence on future behaviors.
Parenting Styles and Gender
Aside from parenting styles, there’s an interest in whether or not certain parental genders are more inclined to utilize a particular parenting style. While research about various parenting styles and their success exists, there is less research available that investigates differences in perceptions of maternal and paternal parenting or the association between certain parenting styles and parental gender . At a foundational level, variations between men and women with respect to personality traits has been examined. For example,  found that men and women’s personalities are slightly different from one another across ten aspects of the Big Five Personality Traits, which tests the person’s: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Although slight differences in personality were evident as there were differences between scores, the study showed that culture played a massive part towards how men and women’s personalities differed .
Beyond individual personality traits and culture, it is important to remember that family structure matters as well. Maternal parenting styles can differ from paternal parenting styles and therefore should be examined both individually and collectively. Parents are often associated as being a functional unit in which children are raised, but both parents will often play different roles in the child’s life. Quite often, children go to each parent for different reasons. For example, children may go to their fathers if they want to play, but will go to their mothers for nurture and support. Infants are also likely to form an attachment-bond with their primary caregiver, typically mothers, and rely primarily on that caregiver in infancy as a source of nurture and sustenance . It has been suggested in studies that maternal parenting styles often have the greatest effect on developing children . Thus, it can be concluded that mothers and fathers play somewhat different roles in context of parenting and may have to parent and behave differently than each other, based on their respective genders, in order to be the best attuned to their child’s needs. The child naturally discriminates that the female-gendered parent is for nurturance and support and that the male-gendered parent as a playmate, thus it is important to recognize such behaviors and prepare to respond to them accordingly.
Significance of the Study
In 21st century we all are dealing with a time crisis! The more people get caught up in various activities the less time they have for their children. Today parent child relationship is weak and superficial; the main reason is those parents don’t get enough time to spend with their children’s. Today Parenting is being assaulted from many directions .parents are under the gun of mounting economic pressures resulting in long work hours, and often more than one job .Our 24-hour a day culture has created a job market that never goes to sleep, and many parents find themselves working hours outside of the usual nine to five workday. This leaves big gaps in childcare arrangements. Another cultural development that has significantly impacted the family is the explosion of mass media and mass communication, particularly internet style. This evolutionary step in technology has permanently changed the environment within which parents are trying to monitor and control the development of their children. The massive exposure to all kinds of information, and particularly information that is unhealthy or beyond the scope of a child’s developmental age , has placed parents in the untenable position of battling outside influences that tear at the parent-child relationship rather than assisting to safeguard family values, parental guidelines, and promote normal psychological growth. “Quality” time spend with the parents leads to positive development in the child, Trust, Love and Self independence are the essential component in a parentchild relationship. Therefore the first aim of the study is to find the frequency of most prevalent parenting styles used by the parents these days.
Children need both a mother and a father; they need both the nurturing style that most mothers bring to the family as well as a more challenging and real-world based style that seem to be innate to most fathers. So the present study focuses on how the parenting styles of fathers and mothers differ, and how can we blend them in a family to benefit the children as they grow up and prepare for life. These differing styles can be overgeneralized based on gender. In some families, mothers can be more demanding and fathers more nurturing. But the essential key is balancing the different parenting styles and getting the best impact from the blend. It is clear from the research that fathers have a critical role to play in the lives of their children. And fathers readily acknowledge that mothers are essential as well. If these parenting styles aren’t blended effectively children can feel confused or conflicted with different expectations from Mom and Dad or when parents seem so different, children can be drawn more to one parent or the other because of their affinity for the specific parenting style. Finding the appropriate balance between parenting styles is the key to success. Balancing and blending require careful thought and action. Recognizing that different styles are not bad, just different, and communicate together as parents and they will find this whole parenting much more rewarding process.
Although past research suggests that children tend to benefit from being reared by an authoritative parent, much of this research has focused on mothers . Researchers often assess the parenting style of mothers and assume that fathers parent in the same way. Unfortunately, we have little information regarding the extent to which this assumption is correct. Some studies have assessed the parenting styles of both mothers and fathers but then have excluded families from analysis if the parents show different parenting styles . In other instances, researchers have averaged the parenting scores of mothers and fathers [17,6]. Given these methodological limitations, we have little knowledge regarding the extent to which husbands and wives show similar styles of parenting. We expect that they often display different approaches to parenting. If this is the case, it raises the issue of the manner in which these contrasting approaches to parenting influence child development. Past research has shown, for example, that authoritative parenting is more beneficial to children than indulgent parenting. To demonstrate how parenting styles affect children’s development, studies on perfectionism have indicated that parenting styles did have different effects. Families that were typically perceived by their children as authoritative would be more prone to adaptive perfectionism or at least deter them from maladaptive dimensions. Authoritarian parenting styles were positively associated with feelings of being criticized, doubts of ability, and expectations of being perfect. Children also reported feeling more anxious and overwhelmed by challenges; permissive parenting styles were positively associated with trying new challenges; neglectful styles of parenting were positively correlated with similar maladaptive dimensions that were similar to those from authoritarian parenting. In context to the development of perfectionism, authoritative parenting styles typically result in adaptive perfectionism whilst authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful parenting styles typically resulted in maladaptive and neurotic facets of perfectionism .
A global evaluation of  and  studies reinforced the idea that the authoritative parent was the optimal parental style. Adolescents from authoritative families would perform better in all youth outcomes examined when compared to adolescents from neglectful families. Results from authoritarian and indulgent families were less clear as they showed a mixture of positive and negative outcomes. For example, adolescents from authoritarian parents-strict but not warm-showed a reasonably adequate position of obedience and conformity with norms (they did well in school and were less likely than their peers to be involved in deviant activities); conversely, they also manifested lower selfreliance and self-competence, and higher psychological and somatic distress. And adolescents from indulgent families-warm but not strict-showed high self-reliance and self-competence, but also showed higher levels of substance abuse and school problems. According to , adolescents from authoritarian and indulgent families would perform on all outcomes between the maximum adjustment of the authoritative group and the minimum adjustment of the neglectful group. Studies conducted in the USA using middle-class European American samples fully supported the idea that the authoritative parenting style was always associated with optimum youth outcomes [15,16,23,22]. In addition, a number of studies conducted in other countries using different youth outcomes as criteria, also supported the idea that, compared to the authoritative style, a neglectful style of parenting corresponded with childrens’ poorest performance, whereas authoritarian and indulgent parenting occupied an intermediate position: school integration, psychological well-being United Kingdom; , adaptive achievement strategies, self-enhancing attributions Finland; , drug use Iceland; ), and accuracy in perceiving parental values Israel; Knafo & Schwartz, 2003). Finally, in terms of other problematic behavior such as a drinking and alcohol abuse, research once again indicates that authoritative parenting is the golden key to helping prevent some of these problems. However, in this study, it seemed that permissive parenting styles were most likely to be positively correlated with alcohol abuse. In addition, paternal permissive parenting styles especially increased sons’ consumption of alcohol, particularly beer, which tended to result with more drinking problems . As noted earlier, there is strong evidence that children achieve the most positive developmental outcomes when they are reared by authoritative parents. Such parents are high on both responsiveness and control (Figures 1-3). More than three decades of research has shown that authoritative parenting is positively related to school commitment, psychological well-being, and social adjustment and negatively related to conduct problems and delinquency [15-19]. Although these studies provide important information regarding the link between various parenting styles and adolescent developmental outcomes, they do not address the issue of the consequences for children when parents engage in different styles of parenting. Past research on interparental inconsistency has focused primarily on specific parental behaviors (e.g., inconsistent expectations for the child) rather than inconsistencies in parenting style. Folbre et al (2001) said that taking care of children is a complicated mixture of work and love in which the relationship itself is very important.
Figure 1: Scores 1 on the scale.
Figure 2: Scores 2 on the scale.
Figure 3: Scores 3 on the scale.
Researchers have begun to study the affect of the child’s attachment to the father as well as the mother (Thompson, 2000). Father’s relationships with their children are actually very important, despite what many people may think. According to Dalton III, Frick‐Horbury, and Kitzmann (2006) reports of father’s parenting, but not mothers, were related to the quality of current relationships with a romantic partner. Also, father’s parenting was related to the view of the self as being able to form close and secure relationships. We generally expect the combination of two authoritarian parents to be rather rare. This prediction is based on our belief that there is usually no room for two authoritarian parents in one family as both will want to be in control of family decision making. Therefore, if one of the parents is authoritarian, we anticipate that the other will be either authoritative, indulgent, or uninvolved. Furthermore, based on sex role we expect mothers to be overrepresented in styles high in nurturance (indulgent and authoritative) and fathers to be overrepresented in styles characterized by strong control (authoritarian and authoritative). Based on this idea, B  suggests a possibly common combination that she calls traditional parenting. This refers to a family parenting style in which the mother and father enact traditional gender roles. In such cases, the mother is significantly more responsive than demanding, whereas the father is significantly more demanding than responsive. Findings from , , and  provide support for the idea that parents often display such a division of labor. This suggests that there should be an overrepresentation of family parenting styles consisting of an indulgent mother combined with an authoritarian father.  and  have noted, however, that fathers with a traditional gender ideology show less parental involvement than those with an egalitarian ideology. This would suggest that the consequence of traditional sex role socialization is likely to be an overrepresentation of family parenting styles containing either an authoritative or an indulgent mother with an uninvolved father. A few studies have investigated the association between family parenting styles and adolescent outcomes, but as we have noted, there are various methodological problems associated with their approach. They either assume that both parents display the same parenting style, delete families in which mothers and fathers show different styles, or average the styles of mothers and fathers. The study by Fletcher et al. (1999) explicitly considered the impact of various combinations of parenting styles on adolescent outcomes. They found that adolescents with one authoritative parent exhibited greater academic competence than did peers with parents who showed similar but nonauthoritative styles. Furthermore, adolescents with one authoritative and one nonauthoritative parent exhibited greater internalized distress than did those from families where the parents displayed similar styles. Furthermore, it is only in the case of authoritative parenting that their analyses addressed the issue of whether the benefits of a parenting style vary by gender of parent. Thus, for example, an indulgent mother paired with an uninvolved father was classified as the same family parenting style as an uninvolved mother paired with an indulgent father.
Numerous studies have established the influence of maternal parenting on adolescent adjustment . A smaller body of work has demonstrated a link between fathers’ parenting and adolescent adjustment. Studies that examined both mothers’ and fathers’ parenting found considerable overlap but also some differences. For instance, in a study of parents of early adolescents, found only 29.6% rated both their parents as authoritative. Other studies found that according to both parental self-report and adolescent ratings, mothers of adolescents are more likely to use authoritative parenting than are fathers (Milevsky, Schlechter, Klem, & Kehl, 2008; Smetana, 1995) [32-36]. Consequently, adolescents with a mother who uses authoritative parenting may live in a context in which the father uses a different parenting style. It is therefore important to examine both mothers and fathers to deepen our understanding of family systems (Smetana, Campione-Barr, & Metzger, 2006)
The interdependence of maternal and paternal parenting is highlighted in several theoretical frameworks (e.g., ecological systems theory [Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1994], life course theory [Elder, 1998], family systems theory[Minuchin,1985], and transactional model [Sameroff, 2009]). Although a significant minority of adolescents live in single-parent families, most North American adolescents live in two-parent families (Lofquist, Lugaila, O’Connell, & Feliz, 2012; Statistics Canada, 2012). Because research has shown that adolescents benefit from a consistent socialization environment in which each parent is predictable and reliable in affect, behavior, and limit setting (McHale & Irace, 2011), parents have been encouraged to provide a united front in their interactions with their adolescent children (Gordon, 2000). Relatively little research has examined interparental similarity and whether it promotes better child or adolescent adjustment. There is preliminary evidence that compared to having two unsupportive parents or one First, we are interested in whether adolescents achieve better outcomes when they have two rather than simply one authoritative parent. Second, we are concerned with the extent to which an authoritative parent can compensate for the less competent parenting by his or her mate. We expect that the answer to this question varies by the type of style displayed by the second parent. Although a single authoritative parent may be sufficient when the second parent is indulgent, this may not be the case when the second parent is uninvolved. Furthermore, it may be that the answer to these questions depends on the sex of the parent. Authoritative mothers may compensate for an uninvolved father, for example, whereas an authoritative father may not be able to compensate for an uninvolved mother. Finally, we are interested in whether some husband-wife combinations involving non authoritative parenting styles are as effective as having an authoritative parent. The research on authoritative parenting is often interpreted as indicating that the optimal family environment for children combines support and nurturance with structure and control (Amato & Fowler, 2002; Simons, Simons, & Wallace, 2004). However, perhaps both dimensions of parenting need not be provided by the same person. Responsiveness might be bestowed by one parent and structure and control by the other. If this is the case, an indulgent-authoritarian combination may be as effective as having one authoritative parent.
a) To find the frequency of most prevalent parenting style used by girls child father. b) To find the frequency of most prevalent parenting style used by girls child mother. c) To find the frequency of most prevalent parenting style used by boys child father. d) To find the frequency of most prevalent parenting style used by boys child mother. e) To find the level of using various parenting style by the father of the girl child. f) To find the level of using various parenting style by the mother of the girl child. g) To find the level of using various parenting style by the father of the boy child. h) To find the level of using various parenting style by the mother of the boy child. i) To see the gender wise difference in using different parenting styles of the father and mother.
a) There will be difference between the parenting style for girl child and boy child. b) There will be difference between mothers parenting style and fathers parenting style.
Design: In the present study, descriptive survey method was employed to collect the data.
The present study intended to study the gender-wise difference in parenting styles of mother and father. So to achieve the aim of the study the following methodology was used.
The participants of the present study comprised of 40 children of both genders within the age range of 11 to 15 years, studying in classes 6, 7th , 8th and 9th standard of English medium schools in Pune. The sample was randomly selected from the population of 500 children and was equally divided into 20 boys and 20 girls. The sample of the study was collected through the method of purposive and convenience.
A questionnaire was developed with the help of Parental Authority Questionnaire PAQ which was developed by Buri (1991) to measures perceived parenting styles, which classify parenting style as permissive, authoritarian and authoritative parenting styles. The tool consists of 30 items and to be responded on five point likert scale and indicate appropriately as to how they perceive their mother or mother figure’s parenting style. The Cronbach alpha values for the subscales range from 0.87 to 0.74. The content, criterion, and discriminant validity were also reported to be high. The present questionnaire consisted of 20 statements with 5 items in each parenting style. It is rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). The scale is scored by summing the individual items to compare subscale scores. The scores on each subscale range from 5 to 25. The highest score on one of the subscales indicates the parents’ parenting style. It was divided in 3 levels, children who scored between 5 to 11 was considered low, 12 to 18 was considered average and 19 to 25 was considered high on each parenting style. It being a pilot study standardization, reliability and validity is not established yet.
Inclusion Criteria: The inclusion criteria were, the children of the age group 11 to 15 years with both parents living.
Exclusion Criteria: The exclusion criteria were students absent on the day of data collection, and who had single parents children who are below 11 years of age and above 15 years of age.
Participants were student between the age ranges of 11 to 15 years. Permission was granted by the Principal of the school after discussing the nature of the study, the time required and assurance of complete confidentiality. Then the nature of the study was explained to the class teacher of the respective classes. Before actually conducting this study a short prior contact was made with the respective participants and the objective was explained to the participants. A letter of consent was handed over to the participants to seek permission to participate in the study from their parents. On receiving the letter of consent from parents a day was decided to carry out the actual data collection. The questionnaires were given to the respondents during the class hour. The researcher initially read and explained the instructions on how to fill in and answer the questionnaire to the respondents.
Data collected was analyzed using the SPSS 20. Descriptive statistics was used and reported in percentages, measures of central tendency (mean and median), as well as measures of central of dispersion (standard deviation and range). Finally t-test was carried out to analyze gender differences for the parenting style among girls and boys.
For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/
For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences Please Click
Follow on Twitter : https://twitter.com/lupine_online
Follow on Blogger : https://lupinepublishers.blogspot.com/