Football Manager 2020 Summer Transfer Update
Explanations of all personality attributes, personality descriptions and media handling style descriptions, as well as advice on how to learn and manage player personalities. Football Manager 2020 Pairs & Combinations Guide 76248 Feb 13, 2020. FM 2020 Transfer Update - Football Manager Stories. Football manager 2020 latest patch. The game lets you play the role of a manager responsible for developing a professional soccer team. Football Manager 2020 Mobile v11.1 Mod apk for Android. Download Football Manager 2020 Free.
Download Real Football Hack 2020 Latest Version v1.7.1
The Epic Games download includes cross-network play with the Steam version, meaning users can transfer their Football Manager 2020 progress onto the Epic version. In the game, the players are working as the manager of the team. Also home of the FMI FM20 Update. Does not require root or jailbreak. Open the game and enjoy Football Manager 2020 with real names. Start new topic No links to patches on. Latest Release: 21 Nov 2020 07: 39: 32; For Game: FM2020; Changes: 143, 847; Downloads: 341, 598; Contributors: 1, 683; Everyone can contribute to our update!
Football Manager 2020 Guide
Sports Interactive has issued an updated patch for Football Manager adding all of the transfers from the January transfer window (thanks: The Patches Scrolls). Guide to player personalities on Football Manager. For the next week, Football Manager 2020 will be free to download via the gaming distribution platform Steam. Chelsea FC manager Frank Lampard is ready to reintegrate Antonio Rudiger at Stamford Bridge, according to a report. The patch which is provided here allows you to fix a series of bugs that unfortunately come with the game. Play full season Fantasy Football, Basketball, Baseball, and Hockey all in one multi-sport [HOST]. Save the Game Before the Match.
Patch most common passwords of 2020 revealed: '123456' most
This thread is locked. How to play Football Manager 2020 for free. Football Manager 2020: Table for Cheat Engine. How to install for manual download? Football Manager Stats Patch Final *All UEFA Cup & All CL Teams+Update. Football Manager 2020 review: an intoxicating gateway to try this out. Read our full review to find out more.
Download Football Manager 2020 Free PC Game Full Version
Football Manager 2020 is free on Steam for the next week, starting at 3: 00pm (GMT) on Wednesday March 18th and ending. See full details for the complete list. Football Manager 2020 Demo - Free Download these details. Football Manager 2020 and Watch Dogs 2 are free to own on. Unlike Football Manager 2020, which led on the introduction of the development centre feature, Football Manager 2020 has focused less on big ticket features and more on ease of access and quality. Security Over 80% companies re-structured their cybersecurity infrastructure in 2020. Home of Football Manager tools (Genie Scout, FMSE, MacAssistant) and FM scouting.
Football Manager 2020 review - Latest Gaming News
Top Football Manager Hack Online Cheat Unlimited Coins. Football Manager 2020 Game Download for pc is published by Sega great gaming publisher for Android, Macintosh operating systems, Nintendo Switch, Google Stadia, iOS, Microsoft Windows, and another famous operating system. Football Manager 2020 makes its debut on the Epic Games Store today. Football Ground Guide Your Guide to Betting Promo Codes – 2020. Football Manager 2020 is the latest release in the best-selling, smash-hit series. HowlingMadAsh commented 1 hour. Massimiliano Allegri resigned as Newcastle manager on 30 June 2020, after signing.
Real Football for Android - APK Download
Football Manager 2020 - Video Game - PC/Mac - Official Site. Football Manager Game Fixes, No-CD Game Fixes, No-CD Patches, No-CD Files, PC Game Fixes to enable you to play your PC Games without the CD in the drive. Football Manager 20.4.4 Crack & Torrent FM21 Crack (2020). C++ Builder, Delphi, and Java applications. Real Football is a free simulation sports game where you'll be able to win a league or cup championship, play with world champions, be a manager of a fantasy team, and more.
Pre-Match Thread: Barcelona vs Sevilla [La Liga]
Match: Barcelona vs Sevilla
Competition: La Liga
Date: Sunday, 4th of October 2020
Time: 21:00 CEST / 15:00 EDT - Convert to local time
Venue: Camp Nou, Barcelona - 99354 capacity
Referee: Jesús Gil Manzano
Lineups and Squads:
Barcelona - Official squad confirmed
DEF: Dest, Piqué,
MID: Busquets, Aleñá, Pjanić,
ATT: Griezmann, Messi, Dembélé, Trincão, Braithwaite, Ansu Fati, Konrad
Unavailable: Ter Stegen, Umtiti, Firpo (injured) Lenglet (suspended)
Not called: Rafinha, Todibo
Sevilla - Official squad to be confirmed
GK: Tomáš Vaclík, Bono, Javi Díaz
DEF: Sergi Gómez, Jules Koundé, Escudero, Diego Carlos, Navas,
MID: Ivan Rakitić, Lucas Ocampos, Roque Mesa, Alejandro Pozo, Nemanja Gudelj, Óscar Rodríguez, Óliver Torres, Franco Vázquez, Ibrahim Amadou, Joan Jordán, Fernando, Suso, Aleix Vidal, Marcos Acuña
ATT: Munir, Luuk de Jong, Carlos Fernández, Bryan Gil, Youssef En-Nesyri
Unavailable: Sébastien Corchia (injured) Carlos Fernández, Bryan Gil (doubtful)
- Last meeting: Sevilla 0:0 Barcelona
- Date: Friday, 19th of June 2020, 22:00 CEST
- Competition: La Liga
- Threads: Pre-match thread | Match thread | Post-match thread
- Highlights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GLH-mDd_O4
- Form: [W] W W W L
- Goals scored: 15
- Goals conceded: 10
- Last match: Celta de Vigo 0:3 Barcelona - La Liga
- Form: [W] W L W W
- Goals scored: 11
- Goals conceded: 7
- Last match: Sevilla 1:0 Levante - La Liga
Comments (Post-match thread):
Author: Follow_The_Lore | Score: 303 pts | Source
Substitutions were way too late. Our midfield has no creativity without de Jong. No winger. How do you expect to beat a defensive team playing like that?Author: gmemo96 | Score: 181 pts | Source
I don’t get why Ansu didn’t come on. Suarez is out of shape to be playing 90 mins and Ansu could of caused some danger coming in at the 65th minuteAuthor: ayo69 | Score: 129 pts | Source
It's not that we dropped points that worries me, but more that Setien looked completely clueless in that second half. I didn't think we'd see us have a worse second half than the one in the Clasico but here we areAuthor: --Kaiser-- | Score: 76 pts | Source
I just wonder if this will make Setien understand that Fati is not just a talent getting playtime, he is a crucial part of the squad that makes it function properly. Trash game... All hopes on La Real, but they rarely beat Madrid even at Anoeta, Madrid have much more problem at San Mames, and they also lost to Alaves last game so my hopes for them not losing to Madrid are next to zero... Objectively I think we will lose La Liga by at least 5 points based on current form, but anything can happen.Author: maurid | Score: 75 pts | Source
I’m not saying Suarez is not good for us, and I’m not saying his time in Barcelona is over. I really like him and on a good day he’s one of the best strikers in the world.Author: poisonmonger | Score: 63 pts | Source
TODAY, he shouldn’t have been on the pitch for more than 45 minutes. He looked tired as fuck, and barely contributed to the team’s attacks (can you even call them attacks).
Griezmann should’ve been subbed on earlier too. Setien dropped the ball big time today, and he’s probably going to have to answer for his decisions in this game alone.
Let’s see if he’s as sincere and self aware as he’s been on previous press conferences.
You may call it a knee-jerk reaction, but Setien's subs were absolutely horrible today. The way we were playing in the first half, we could've won the game. Suarez was not moving, and surprisingly Messi was not good too. 3 b2b games, I understand, but why was he afraid to use the academy guys? Griezmann and Puig could've done fuckall in the 15 mins they were on the pitch. Goes on to show our Messi-dependancy, and slightly how important FdJ is to the team.Author: Last_Lorien | Score: 57 pts | Source
Ngl, defence did well to save our asses.
Hopefully, we haven't dropped the trophy here. Heads up, Still a few games to be played.
Onto the next one.
It’s not the result, but how it happened.Author: praveerk | Score: 35 pts | Source
If that same group of players still on the field after 80 minutes had been relentlessy trying to score, shot after shot, then it would make sense to leave them be and change next to nothing, one of those shots was bound to get in sooner or later, or that reasoning would still probably make sense - but they weren’t. They were barely holding on in the second half, not suffering particularly but creating so little and accomplishing zero, getting more and more tired and more and more clueless.
This is on the manager, imo.
Curiously, I said just before the match that I wouldn’t be hopeless if we dropped points tonight, which just goes to show how susceptible I am to overreactions, ‘cause right now I’m thinking this is the league. I know cooler heads will prevail etc, but right now it sucks.
Well, that made at least one thing clear: Marty shouldn't be given anything to do except the duties of a 9. Putting him on the wing is counterproductive. He won't be be effective and we'll be sacrificing a better suited player. I don't begrudge QQ for experimenting but I hope he learns his lesson now. If Madrid catch up to us(likely), the title will be theirs to lose. Well, I guess it always was with all the crap that went down, but they should dissolve their club if they don't win the league now.
Koeman: "Sergi Roberto is doing well. There's a lot of competition. Dest is the future but it doesn't mean he can't play now. He has played at a high level at Ajax." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Which player from the Dream Team would I choose to reinforce the current team with? Myself." (laughs) - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "We can always improve things, but overall I am very happy. Our attitude is very good and I hope we continue like this." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "If a player is unhappy, let him speak to me. Ousmane has not told me anything. If he stays, I count on him and he will have options to play." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Depay? There are two positions in the team where we could use one more player: the centre-back and the centre-forward positions. There is competition but we are going to play a lot of games. It would help us to have one more per position." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Messi has always trained and played at a maximum level, he has done everything for the club and the team and I have no complaints. There is no discussion, for me he's the best player in the world and he's very focused." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Champions League draw? We have to prove it game by game but in general, we can be happy." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "It's good to start against strong rivals to know where we are." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Coutinho? He's a very good player and has also learned a lot during his stay at Bayern. My role as a coach is to get the most out of each player and that starts with putting the players in their position." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Dest? I don't know if he can enter the list. We're waiting for his license to be resolved. He has a lot of quality, at 17 he has already played at the highest level. We're reinforcing ourselves with him." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "We look for intensity in training. We play like we train. We don't go out on the pitch to rest." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "I can't say much about Dembélé, his presence depends on the rival and how he is in training. His future? I haven't yet seriously spoken to him about that." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "We want Eric García, but there are only a few days of the market left. Hopefully we can sign him, but the economic issue is complicated." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "I love the eagerness of the team. We're fine and confident." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "We have only been together for five weeks, the team and the staff, and we are working well. It was noticeable against Celta, where we won suffering with one player less." - src @barcacentre
Koeman: "Sevilla are strong and it will be a difficult game, but we play at home, we have two victories and we trust ourselves." - src @barcacentre
[Article] - Ronald Koeman sensing a positive vibe - fcbarcelona.com
[Article] - Rakitić back at Camp Nou 32 days after - fcbarcelona.com
[Training] - Recovery session - fcbarcelona.com
[Article] - AGAINST THE CLOCK | Name the 15 footballers who have played for Barça and Sevilla in the 21st century - fcbarcelona.com
[Article] - How to watch FC Barcelona v Sevilla - fcbarcelona.com
Livesoccertv | Liveonsat | FCBarcelona.com
The lesser-known Estonia mystery: Finnish police announce 1987 cruise ship murder & attempted murder has been solved
A quick overview of the 1987 murder case can be found on Wikipedia. Many aspects of it are like straight out of a detective novel: a murder happens in the middle of the sea in an enclosed space, with the perpetrator still onboard as the investigators go around interviewing people. A bag of clothes is discovered on a nearby island, and a shoe is used to track down the city where the suspect lives.
About a month ago, the Finnish police announced that they have solved this 33-year-old cold case (source is the Finnish Broadcasting Company; available in Finnish and in Swedish). The case was passed over to prosecutors, who will now determine whether the available evidence fulfills the criteria of a first-degree murder charge. If it doesn't, and is only enough for a second-degree murder charge, the case will not be moved to prosecution because the statute of limitations has expired (20 years for second-degree murder). First-degree murder has no statute of limitations.
Now, there was another famous, old, unsolved mystery case in the Nordic countries that was purportedly solved this year, the murder of Olof Palme, so I thought it'd be good to underline the key differences between these two announcements.
In the Palme case, the conclusion was essentially “we have determined the person who is most likely the suspect, and that person is dead”.
In the Viking Sally case, however, the conclusion is that they know who did it, the person is alive and they can prove the person did it. The only unclear thing about this case, according to the police, is whether it fulfills the criteria of a first-degree murder and can still be prosecuted.
The YLE article linked previously contains a great long-form text of the events on the 28th of July 1987 for anyone interested in the events, people and the investigation process in detail. I took the liberty of translating it here, with linked pictures:
(Again, if you understand Swedish or Finnish and thought there was a poor translation or a misunderstanding in the text, please let me know!)
BackgroundThe story involved three West German youths on an Interrail trip: Klaus Schelkle (20), Bettina Taxis (22) and Thomas Schmid (21). Schelkle and Schmid’s friendship went years back, having both played and enthusiastically supported football in Stuttgart. Schelkle and Taxis had met each other at a night club and had been dating for a little less than a year at the time of their Interrail trip. From the very beginning of the trip, they had their eyes set on visiting Finland: they traveled to Stockholm and spent only a single night there before boarding Viking Sally, intending to reach the city of Turku by the next morning. In Turku, they had planned on exploring the city, drinking beer and visiting Ruisrock, the second-oldest rock festival in Europe. The festival would be headlined by Peer Günt and Pretenders. From Turku, their trip was to continue towards Lapland and Norway.
Klaus Schelkle and Bettina Taxis in Stockholm the day before boarding Viking Sally.
In the 1992 book Poliisi kertoo (‘The Police tells’, essentially case stories from the police), a chapter written by criminal commissioner Eino Kivimäki is widely regarded as the most accurate and well-corroborated source on the events that transpired on the 28th of July 1987. The YLE article speculates that some of the information must have changed decisively to prompt the re-opening of the investigation in 2016. Nevertheless, the following description of events is largely based on Kivimäki’s text.
Fitting with the sense of youthful adventure an Interrail trip often involves, Schelkle and Taxis had decided to sleep outside on the ship’s deck in sleeping bags. Not wanting to bother the couple, Schmid had decided to stay indoors and keep an eye on everyone’s luggage.
Schelkle and Taxis were described as more sociable on the cruise than Schmid, who wasn’t particularly interested in the cruise ship experience in general. At one point during the evening, Schelkle and Taxis came to tell Schmid that they had met “a fun Finnish guy” who spoke excellent German. This “Finnish guy” was a businessman working in the automotive industry, while Schelkle himself was studying to become a car mechanic. Due to their common interests, they had tried to visit the car deck of the cruise line but found it to be locked. Having decided to try their luck again in the morning, the two men exchanged contact information during the night.
The attackAt approximately 1 in the morning, Schelkle and Taxis woke up the already-sleeping Schmid to retrieve their sleeping bags. The couple headed to the rear portion of the ninth deck, to the helicopter platform. The spot they chose for sleeping was shielded by a plexiglass and was dark due to a broken light fixture.
The West German youths were not the only international travellers on board. A group of international scouts headed to the Nordic LDS Jamboree (a camp for members of the church of the Latter Day Saints) had been wandering around the ship all night, reportedly to the annoyance of other passengers. At approximately 3:45, a trio of Danish scouts made their way to the helicopter deck. Initially not seeing anyone else on the deck, they eventually noticed movement in the dark and identified two persons by the air conduction vents.
Here is a crude reconstruction of the scene and location where the three Danish scouts found Schelkle and Taxis.
At first, the scouts thought the two people were incredibly drunk passengers - not an uncommon sight on Baltic cruise ships in the 1980s, and not an uncommon sight on Baltic cruise ships in 2020 either. One of the Danish people eventually decided to have a closer look at the two persons, only to find both of them covered in blood, with blood also covering large portions of the deck. Both Schelkle and Taxis were able to move but were seriously injured. The scouts were trained in first aid, but did not have adequate skills to deal with injuries of such a massive scale. They contacted the information desk of the ship who alarmed a security guard to the crime scene. The security guard has been heard as a witness in the re-opened investigation and did not want to be interviewed for the YLE article.
There have been conflicting reports over the years on the murder weapon and the condition in which Schelkle and Taxis were found: it was reported that they were found still in their sleeping bags, but this has not been confirmed. The murder weapon was confirmed as a blunt weapon, but media initially reported that the murder weapon was a fireman’s axe. Finally, it was initially reported that Taxis’ finger had been cut off, but the police or emergency responders did not report this. The confirmed fact is that they suffered blunt trauma to the head.
Schelkle and Taxis tried to communicate with the first responders, but they could not be understood. This could be because of their head trauma or simply because no German speakers were present. They were taken to the medical ward of the ship, and straight away their cranial injuries were deemed so severe that the sea emergency and rescue centre of Turku was contacted. A helicopter was sent to retrieve the couple. Taxis was reportedly delirious during the helicopter ride, constantly mistaking the emergency responders as attackers and attempting to shield herself from them. Schelkle had to be administered CPR during the ride. At 5:48 they arrived at the Turku University hospital, where Schelkle was pronounced dead. The helicopter team picked up three crime scene investigators and one technical inspector and headed back to the cruise ship.
The investigationThe investigators were unable to find any witnesses. Thomas Schmid had woken up to the sound of the helicopter during the night, but had falled back asleep. He was interviewed by the police early in the morning. The police did not tell him what had happened to his friends until he had been questioned over and over, and had grown so frustrated and worried that he refused to answer any more questions unless he was told what had happened.
A cruise ship is an atypical crime scene because the perpetrator was almost certainly still onboard. A murder had happened on this same ship the year before, and the passengers had already left the ship by the time the police were able to start their investigation. Learning from their past mistake, the police took a very thorough approach to the investigation: they decided to videotape and gather the contact information of everyone on board. While they did manage to videotape everyone, the task of collecting everyone’s personal information turned out to be so time-consuming that they eventually decided to not collect the information of elderly passengers, children, or people travelling with small children.
The initial onboard investigation determined a 26-year-old Englishman as the primary person of interest. He was found sleeping on the floor inside the ship with blood on his clothes. He claimed it was from a nosebleed. He was on his way to Finland to meet a woman he had previously met on a kibbutz in Israel. He had already been on a cruise ship from Stockholm to Helsinki, but had been denied from disembarking due to his “disheveled, drug addict-like appearance” and was returned to Stockholm. His presence on this cruise ship was his second attempt to enter Finland, which further contributed to him being considered a person of interest. During the night of the attack, he had had a wild night with a group of five Finns. Three of the five Finns had been gambling in Stockholm and lost all their money, and were given tickets back to Finland by the Stockholm social security services. This group of six - the Englishman and the five Finns - had spent the night on the ship enjoying meals at the restaurant and drinking alcohol in various places all over the cruise ship. When the cruise ship reached the harbour in Turku, the group of six were all taken directly to the police station.
The Finns were cleared of suspicion early on and were released. The Englishman was interviewed several times (the police initially had trouble finding a criminal investigator who spoke English well enough to conduct the interviews), but he maintained his innocence. He was kept in jail for two weeks during the investigation, the maximum time allowed without pressing charges. The criminal laboratory examined the blood on the Englishman’s shirt, and determined that it was his own - although it has later been noted that the technology in 1987 could not rule it with absolute certainty.
With no other evidence against the Englishman, he was released. He lived in Finland for several years after the event, but could not be reached by YLE for this article.
The investigation was exceptionally large and was allocated a great deal of resources, including the latest technology: the computer. Early on in the investigation, the police ruled out robbery and sexual assault as motives. Their best assessment of a possible motive was “an insignificant one”, committed by a mentally ill person or someone suffering from a severe personality disorder.
In 1987, the technology available to crime investigations was still relatively poor. CCTVs were relatively rare and image quality was poor. DNA testing only became a standard, systematic technique in the early 1990s. Blood sample analysis could primarily only determine blood group and whether the blood came from an animal or a human. Cruise ships did not properly collect and store passenger information. Passenger interviews remained the main source of information.
Bettina Taxis survived the attack. She was unconscious for weeks and did not regain consciousness until well after she was transferred to a West German hospital. After a year-long bureaucratic process, Finnish investigators were able to interview her, but she was unable to recall anything from the day of the attack.
Time passesOver the next couple of years, the police were looking for several people. Two separate people, referred to as “beanie man” by media based on their description (both had worn beanie hats that stood out), were sought after by the police. One of them was reached in Western Germany and was ruled out as a suspect, but the other one was never reached. This particular “beanie man” was 30 years old, approximately 175 centimetres tall and dark-haired. His appearance, in addition to the beanie hat, was described as disheveled, and he spoke to himself in English. He had been seen carrying something canvas-y (unclear whether this refers to a canvas bag containing something, or some other object that was made of canvas).
A month after the attack, two fishermen landed on the small island of Lilla Björnholm along the cruise ship’s route. The island is uninhabited, surrounded by cliffs and covered in forest. The fishermen noticed a black trash bag on the shore and found clothes inside. Not realising a possible connection to the cruise ship murder, they left the bag on the island. Upon returning to the island in the summer of 1988, the fishermen noticed the bag still in the same place they had discovered it the previous August. This time, they took the bag with them and brought it to the police.
Here is an image of the island where the bag was found, as well as an image of the discovered clothes dressed on a mannequin.
Among the clothes was a Finnish-made Umberto Loofer shoe. The police discovered that the shoes had been sold by a shoe store in Turku, in the year 1985 or 1986. The other clothes found were beige shorts, a red sweater, and a grey working glove with the initials H.K.. The police concluded that based on the location of the trash bag as well as “certain technical investigations”, it seemed likely that the clothes had been on board Viking Sally.
The police investigated well into the 1990s. Passengers caught on the videotape were looked for all over Europe. Some people didn’t report themselves to the police because they felt they had nothing to contribute (this was said by two Swedish youths who didn’t report themselves but were found anyway), whereas some people avoided contacting the police because they considered their cruise trip “unsavoury” or embarrassing for personal, but non-criminal reasons. (The article does not give an example of such a reason.)
Eventually, the case went cold.
Recent developmentsThe investigation stayed cold until the year 2016. The police has not revealed what happened that prompted the re-opening of the investigation. Finally, in September, the lead investigator announced that the case has been solved. However, a legal problem presents itself: in Finland, homicides are classified as kuolemantuottamus, surma, tappo or murha depending on the premeditation and the act itself. Close enough approximations are the American classifications of involuntary manslaughter, voluntary manslaughter, second-degree murder and first-degree murder, respectively. Murha is equivalent to first-degree murder, while tappo is second-degree.
A tappo has a statute of limitations of 20 years, whereas a murha has no statute of limitations. In the 1990s, the case was considered a tappo, but in the early 2000s it was changed to a murha (i.e. a greater degree of premeditation was assumed). If currently available evidence can only support a tappo charge against the person the police have identified, he cannot be prosecuted anymore as the crime has expired in 2007. However, if there is enough evidence to support a murha charge, the police can and certainly will prosecute. The case is currently pending charge considerations to determine exactly this. However, until the charge consideration is finished, the police will not reveal the name, gender, nationality of age of the suspect. They confirm that the suspect did not know the victims beforehand, and has been interviewed several times, but has not been taken into custody. The suspect denies his/her involvement.
The prosecutor expects the charge consideration to be finished by the end of this year.
One thing we know for certain: no new crime scene evidence has been uncovered, because the cruise ship sank in 1994 in the deadliest maritime disaster in Europe.
The rest of the article concerns the life of Thomas Schmid after the attack. He was cleared of suspicion early on in the investigation (and re-cleared in the 2016 investigation), and now lives in Stuttgart with his family. He is hopeful about the result of the investigation, and hopes it brings some closure to Klaus Schelkle’s parents.
Personal thoughtsMan, I hope they have enough evidence to charge the person with first-degree murder. I don’t know what information they can reveal if they conclude the crime has passed the statute of limitations, but the YLE article says that criminal commissioner Kivimäki did not want to give an interview until the investigation material is published, out of respect to the current lead investigator. This would imply that the evidence, results and overall course of the investigation will be made public. To some degree, in any case. Maybe someone here knows more about this?
I’ll definitely post an update if and when this case gets an update, hopefully within the next couple of months!
And boy, was that cruise ship cursed or what? Two separate murder incidents and a deadly sinking?